[Eruditions Home Page]         [Author Page]     [About Eruditions]      (SeeDisclaimerat foot of page)

gif imagegif image

Publishing Contracts:
What is negotiable and what is not? image gif
                 [Next - Contents & Introduction]
 
 
 
 

[Many academics confronted by a lengthy book publishers' contract tend to feel confused and hesitant. What does all this fine print mean? Their work is their professional intellectual property. How much control should they relinquish and what should they get in return? It is a difficult position to be in. Who to turn to: the publisher with its smooth assurances? The advice of colleagues? Author/writer organisations?

This page is to assist new authors to be more critical of both publishers and less well-informed advisers. These comments are not intended to imply a lack of professional ethics among publishers or author/writer organisations.]
                [Next - Publishing Agreement]         [top]
 

The Publishing Agreement image gif
You know a publisher is taking you seriously when you receive a publishing contract to sign.
A Memorandum of Agreement (as it is often called) is normally many pages long with much legalistic fine print.

Why have an Agreement?

It specifies the rights of each party in the publishing process. At its core is an exchange of promises: the author promises to write and deliver a manuscript and the publisher promises to publish and sell the work.The agreement is made legally enforceable by the publisher's promise to pay a royalty to the author in return for the rights granted to the publisher.
                  [Pub Agreement - Continued 2]         [back]       [top]
 
 
 

Why is it so long?

Apart from these essential elements a publishing contract has much else besides. There are conditions, qualifications, explanations, numerous 'If this happens, then this...'  and much more.

What does it mean?

Is the contract simply designed to strip authors of their legitimate rights with little financial return (as many author associations would argue)? Or does it simply make clear the nature of the relationship between author and publisher (as most publishers would argue)? There is some truth in both sides.
 

                  [Pub Agreement - Continued 3]         [back]       [top]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

From the Author's point of view: image gif

The author may work unrewarded for years on a book and then receives a mere 10% to 15% of the publisher's return (eg. $2.25 on each copy of a $25 RRP). (The bookseller on the other hand, plays no part in writing or producing the book, purchases stock it can return if unsold, provides shelf space and a cash register and receives up to 45% of the retail price.) The publisher through the contract takes every conceivable right (electronic, book, film etc.), in every place (global, all languages), but frequently makes no attempt whatever to exploit these rights. The Publisher may insist on a non-competing work restriction, and may demand an option on the author's next work, but does not even irrevocably commit itself to actually publishing the finished book (the manuscript must be 'acceptable in form and content' when submitted).
 

                  [Pub Agreement - Continued 4]         [back]       [top]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

From the Publisher's point of view:image gif
It is true that publishing contracts tend to be weighted in favour of the publisher. But then it is the publisher who invests (shareholders') money in expensive production, marketing and distribution. The publisher has both a right and obligation to ensure, so far as possible, the security of, and a return on its investment.

To put it another way, what does an author lose if a book sells only 10% of its print-run? The author can still proudly point to his/her work in print (for a while anyway). The author stands to lose mostly self-esteem and dreams of fame and riches. What does a publisher lose?  Money, and lots of it. The publisher forgoes the income and profit, carries the stock write-off, and wastes resources which might have been better dedicated to another more successful project. If a publisher's books perform in this dismal fashion often enough, staff may be sacked and ultimately it will be forced out of business. So a publishing contract tends to be worded strongly to protect the financial interests of the publisher.
                  [Next - Contract Content]         [back]       [top]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Content of the Agreement: image gif

Apart from detailing the royalties payable and the rights granted, most clauses in publishing contracts are concerned with what happens at various stages of a book's life. Most of these definitions are there because of past (often unhappy) experiences of publishers and authors. The contract is designed to resolve potential conflict before it starts. As such, most clauses serve a useful purpose. Below is a list of what is normally included.
 

                 [ Contract content - Continued 2]         [back]        [top]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Here is a list of some of the non-royalty issues normally covered by a contract.


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Sign or Negotiate?image gif

Should I just accept and sign the contract?

image gifVery few publishers and authors have serious disputes. If however a dispute arises, the contract forms the basis for settling the dispute. Furthermore, no two publishing contracts are the same, some are more reasonable than others. So it is worth checking whether you wish to ask to alter any clauses before you sign. It is too late after you sign. So long as you remain reasonable in your requests, a publisher should always at least discuss your concerns.
 

                 [Sign or Negotiate - Continued 2]        [back]       [top]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 

Negotiating changes to the contract:

Two issues come into play if you seek to negotiate changes in a publishing contract.

image gif

                 [Sign or Negotiate Continued 3]        [back]        [top]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 

 

image gif

Having recognised this, (something author organisations often fail to do), it is worth looking closely at the following sections of your contract. You may be able to negotiate some improvements. You certainly should be aware of your obligations under the contract (eg. non-competing clause).

                 [Next - Clauses to watch]        [back]       [top]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Clauses to watch  :image gif

Any other issues?

image gif    Copyright is what publishing is all about.
    Make sure you own it (your original work) or have it
    granted in writing to you (permissions) for everything is your work.

Be warned: authors (and publishers) get sued,
lose reputations, jobs and careers over serious breaches of copyright.

                [Next - Summary]        [back]       [top]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Summary

The publishing contract is an organised way of approaching a relationship between author and publisher. You may be able to negotiate changes in it, especially if you have a sought-after book or reputation. If you are not happy with your potential publisher, talk to some others. There is nothing like a little healthy competition to obtain a more reasonable attitude to reasonable requests for change. However, do not expect to revolutionise the publishing world in your first contract. It won't happen.
 



Disclaimer:  the information and comment above is given in good faith as honest opinion and comment by the publishing editor and does not refer to any specific individual or organisation. It is not intended to give offence, and should not be relied upon by any person without first seeking further information from a professional source. Any comment deemed offensive should be brought immediately to the attention of the publisher at Eruditions Publishing so that the offending material may be satisfactorily explained or appropriately amended. Corel Corporation gratefully acknowledged for images.